17_Threat Hunt
BluSapphire_Threat Hunt_WhitePaper
Last updated
BluSapphire_Threat Hunt_WhitePaper
Last updated
Incident response strategy has evolved rapidly over past decade as Cyber-attacks are targeted and complex which are in general executed by extremely advanced adversaries who are no longer compromising one or two systems in an enterprise rather, moving laterally within the organization’s network in stealth and may present virtually everywhere. Hence, obsolescent Incident Response and Management methodologies shall fail in identifying compromised systems, fail to provide effective containment of the breach and eventually fail in faster response and remediation of an incident.
Threat hunt combines a proactive methodology, innovative technology, highly skilled people, and in- depth threat intelligence to find and stop the malicious activity. These attacks are hard-to-detect and executed by stealth attackers. Existing preventive tools oaen miss these attacks before they can execute their objectives. Threat Hunting is your last line of defense against reducing Dwell Time of attackers. So, It is no surprise that Threat Hunting is seens as a consistently growing area of investments in organizations.
Threat hunt is a combative procedure in uncovering hidden adversaries with a presumption that the attacker may be present inside an organization’s network for days, weeks and even months, preparing and executing attacks such as Zero Days, Advanced Persistent Threats and Unknown Threats. Threat hunt intends to uncover these malicious activities, seeking out indicators of compromise(s) (IOC’s) oaen based on the Threat Intelligence (TI) OR Hypothesis driven. Sources of tactical and strategic TI can be industry or company specific reports and/or information from previous incidents.
What is NOT Threat Hunting?
There is a lot of disinformation about Threat Hunting, so while defining Threat Hunting, it is also important to note what is not Threat Hunting:
It does NOT replace existing security monitoring
It is NOT a form of Pentest or Vulnerability Assessment
It is NOT Security Monitoring
It is NOT Incident Response – though it often triggers an Incident Response, when it uncovers
something malicious
It is NOT a process that has a guaranteed result
It is NOT a process to check if security analysts in the monitoring team are doing their job
well.
It is NOT for the faint hearted. If Security Monitoring is too challenging, then you have miles
to go, before you are mature enough for Threat Hunting.
Why Threat Hunt? Benefits.
Better ability to uncover hidden and established threats.
The ability to detect threats before the attacker causes damage, hence reducing incident losses.
A threat response process that effectively delivers "negative time" lag, and improvements beyond
fast response.
Improved knowledge of the IT environment, with a focus on the hiding places frequented by
advanced threat actors.
A reduced attack surface resulting from discovered and removed vulnerabilities.
Improved security incident response process.
Identification of gaps in visibility necessary to detect and respond to attackers and their TTPs.
Uncovering new threats and TTPs that can feed data back to Threat Intelligence.
The ability to ensure system hygiene before a critical mission or business transaction, M&A activity
etc.,
A way to validate that the controls both preventative and detective are in proper shape and no
threat actors have established foothold within the environment.
Threat Hunting is a highly data driven process and requires detailed logs, which can be divided into Network Data and Endpoint Data. You also would need Threat Intelligence Data and knowledge of the environment you operate in, for a good Threat Hunt. Typically, it is easier to get access to Network Data than Endpoint Data. The higher the quality of data, the higher likelihood of success of Threat Hunts.
Good Actionable Threat Intelligence is very useful for Threat Hunting process. In most cases of Threat Hunt:
Threat Intelligence is used as a starting point for hunting
Threat Intelligence is also used for contextualizing and driving the hunt process
Threat Hunt by itself results in generating new Threat Intelligence to be fed back into
the Threat Intelligence cycle.
You can also optionally (highly recommended) enrich the data with fields like IP reputation, Geo IP and Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) to find evidence of potentially unwanted activity.
Tools allow you to perform various data transformations and manipulations for proper analysis. Visualizations and statistics used to display the change of values of specific fields over time, like frequency or entropy values are vital for investigations. Clustering, Stacking, Aggregating, grouping and/or frequency distribution techniques are most often used to look for outliers and detect anomalies.
The MITRE ATT&CK Framework can be used as input for potential attack vectors and techniques. MAF provides a wealth of technique information for hunters, guiding the hunt process with detection techniques. Though MAF is primarily used for Security Monitoring, it often acts as a great guide for Threat Hunters too.
Automation should be applied where possible to make the life of a Threat Hunter easier. This allows the team to be more productive. While it is not possible to automate all tasks completely, automation reduces the time to hunt and aides in scheduling and repeatability of Hunts.
Tools Role in Threat Hunt Example Scenario | ||
End Point Detection and Response (EDR) | Collect endpoint data and search endpoints for evidence of attacker activity | Find all machines where svchost.exe is running but its path is not in Windows system directory |
User and En9ty Behavior Analy9cs (UEBA) | Analyze user activity data and find anomalies that may indicate suspicious activity | Display the list of users that behave unusually regarding authenricarion activity |
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) | Analyze and capture log data based on network traffic real ?me | Large File downloads/ Uploads taking place from a specific IP |
Network Behavior Anomaly Detection (NBAD) | Build Hypothesis Based on outcome of analysis of flow data via behavioral techniques such as machine learning in detecting anomalies | CnC/ Botnet communications |
Threat Intelligence (TI) | Deliver a list of threat indicators and threat actor TTPs for use as initial hunting clue | Gather all common persistence mechanisms reported to be used by threat groups looking for specific corporate data |
Security and Event Management Systems (SIEM) | Collect logs, enrich them and enable the analysts to search them in context | Review rare events, rare event sequences and other log-related anomalies |
Threat Hun9ng Tool | Deliver a list of threat indicators and threat actor TTPs for use as initial hunting clue | Gather all common persistence mechanisms reported to be used by threat groups looking for specific corporate data |
BluSapphire has brought down the dependency on people dramatically in performing a threat hunt activity within the environment by introducing ‘Threat Hunt via Agentless Framework’. In most Hun?ng exercises while network data is usually easily obtained, Endpoint Data is the most difficult to acquire.
BluSapphire’s agentless hunting capability has effectively addressed this problem allowing for Live On- Demand Threat Hunts, rather than relying on insufficient data or long deployment cycles.
Our Agentless Framework allows organizations and their security analysts to Hunt, Find, Analyze, Respond and Remediate all in one tool. This drastically reduces the Dwell Time and dramatically improves the analyst’s capabilities.
The framework supports indicators consumption via Threat Intelligence Feeds (STIX2.0) - Adapting indicators from identified threats OR as MITRE Tactics.
IOC’s identified during a Hunt can be exported On-Demand into STIX2.0 and shared with Threat Intelligence collection processes or external Threat Intel Agencies.
BluSapphire consumes Threat Intelligence from over 70 sources along with support for commercial feeds. The intelligence obtained is normalised. The normalised intelligence is utilised both on detection and in Threat Hunts.
Today, BluSapphire has the capability to hunt extensively based on the artifacts collected specific to Tactic ID of MITRE Matrix. Please read our MITRE Whitepaper for further details on our detection capability mapped against the MITRE ATT&CK Framework.
BluSapphire Hunt Capabiliries.
Observation Reason Data Potentially Hunt Coverage of Needed BluSapphire | |||
Presence of Malicious Executable/ Document | An attacker would ship a malicious executable in having privilege escalation Etc. | Endpoint file search (EDR) | File Search with Name/ Hash |
Known filenames with Non-Standard file paths | May indicate the attacker running processes masquerading as Windows system processes | Endpoint process search (EDR) | |
Interactive logons with service accounts | Likely indication of abuse or at least violation of policies | System log search (SIEM, log management with system logs) | Event ID, OS Event Log Etc |
Traffic to sites in dynamic DNS (DDNS) | A large amount of traffic to a DDNS site may indicate exfiltration or C&C (C2) activity | Detailed DNS logs, outbound connection logs or traffic capture (SIEM or NTA, NBAD) | Indicators via Traffic Analysis, Least/ Most Occurrence of DNS Requests |
Processes in Windows AutoRun registry keys | Uncommon entries that set processes to AutoRun on Windows may indicate intruder tampering with the system | Endpoint registry search (EDR) | Registry Inputs |
Activity by account previously compromised by attackers | A\acker may try to return to accounts they used in the past, thus revealing more about their activities | Authentication and other system logs (SIEM or UEBA) | Connections with Nonstandard ports, Hunt by Services, Scheduled Tasks & Processes |
Unusual child processes | When a process is exploited, it may be used to spawn processes useful for the a\acker (like cmd.exe) that are not common in regular system use; especially if those processes ini?ate network ac?vity | Advanced endpoint process search (EDR) | Hunt by Processes |
Processes executing out of temporary directories | An a\acker may only have write access to some directories, so may run code from them | Endpoint process search (EDR or other tools) | Hunt by Services, Scheduled Tasks & Processes |
Processes that normally do not initiate or receive network activity | If a process with a familiar name starts connecting to a site in a remote country, it may indicate that it has been corrupted by the attacker | Advanced endpoint process search (EDR) | Hunt by Services, Scheduled Tasks & Processes |
BluSapphire offers a Unified Platform that provides a great coverage for many of the TTPs in the MITRE ATT&CK Framework, representing bulk coverage in each of the attack categories. Several capabilities, including full-stream reassembly of L7 transactions at scale, real-time Endpoint Inquiry and context retrieval, Agentless On-Demand Live Threat Hunting, and guided investigations featuring direct links to the relevant MITRE TTP listings for some detections, make it unique in the Cyber Security Advance Defense space.
These capabilities enable BluSapphire to detect more MITRE ATT&CK TTPs with fewer false positives and more rapid, confident investigations using fast agentless response and remediation at your fingertips for each detection.
BluSapphire has been recognized by Gartner as cool vendor in Cyber Security space and an independent Gartner paper on innovative companies in IT, names BluSapphire as the only vendor in Cyber Space.
Looking to Step Up your game. Look no further than BluSapphire.
Threat intelligence is evidence-based knowledge, including context, mechanisms, indicators, implications and actionable advice, about an existing or emerging menace or hazard to assets that can be used to inform decisions regarding the subject's response to that menace or hazard.
BluSapphire consumes Threat Intelligence from over 60+ sources. The intelligence obtained is further normalized. The normalized intelligence is utilized both on detection and in hunt sequences.
Endpoint Detection & Response capability is important to detect suspicious behaviors at the endpoint computing stack. This usually entails monitoring, logging of all activities at both system and user stack looking for potential malicious activity, that usually goes unnoticed by signature-based systems. The Achilles heal of EDR based systems is that it needs to be installed on every single endpoint on the network.
There is zero-visibility of an endpoint does not have EDR installed. In most Enterprises, this is always challenging due to dynamic nature of Infrastructure, sensitivity of operational systems, Industrial Control Systems, Thin Clients and varying operational requirements.
BluSapphire employs an agentless model for response and remediation that does NOT need to be installed on every endpoint in your organization.
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) and Network Behaviour Anomaly Detection (NBAD). To detect suspicious traffic which organizations and security leaders are looking at Behaviour based traffic analysis tools. This complement and in many cases can replace traditional signature-based network solutions. NTA and NBAD also help enterprises detect suspicious traffic that other security tools are missing. Most of these tools require a SPAN port to monitor traffic and use Behavioural techniques to detect suspicious traffic. Most solutions also heavily depend on SSL-Decryption to work, and this becomes the Achilles heel, as it impacts scalability and efficacy of detection.
BluSapphire does not rely on SSL Decryption and hence easier to deploy and scale, while offering higher detection and response capabili?es. BluSapphire while relying on network behaviour-based techniques also employs signal intelligence techniques to understand and detect malicious traffic. In most cases, SSL-Decryption is only good for compliance monitoring, and NOT effective for Threat Detection. Threat Actor(s) almost always use their own encryption for Data Ex-Filtration, Command and Control.
